Organic food sellers are constantly touting the superior taste and health benefits of their products. But can they back this up with any evidence?
Organic food can often cost far more than the “non-organic†alternative. But is it really worth paying more for it? Is it any better for you, or for the environment?
So far, the scientific consensus is clear: no. Organic food is not any more nutritious, does not taste any better, nor is any safer than traditionally grown crops. It does not seem to be any better for the environment either, especially compared to genetically engineered crops that, by design, require fewer pesticides that traditionally-grown or organic food.
In 2012, a study by Stanford University confirmed what the rest of the scientific community had already been saying. There is just no evidence that organic is better.
So why do some people swear by it? The most obvious reason is the placebo effect. Because the branding will typically make claims about it tasting better, and because people will almost certainly have paid more for it, they are likely to receive some placebo effect from expecting it to be better.
However, when it comes down to the option of buying a luxury brand or an organic brand, the choice is clear. Even if the luxury brand is no better either, the placebo will probably be even bigger. For the rest of us, it is time to save some money guilt free.
Don't have time to check my blog? Get a weekly email with all the new posts. This is my personal blog, so obviously it is 100% spam free.
Tags: food, food quality, organic, organic food
This entry was posted on Thursday, February 23rd, 2017 at 11:00 am and is filed under Food, Science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.